We offer a comprehensive curriculum developed by an international team, experienced teachers, and a focus on individualized and project-based learning.
We offer a comprehensive curriculum developed by an international team, experienced teachers, and a focus on individualized and project-based learning.
Chalkboards gave way to whiteboards. Whiteboards gave way to projectors. And now, projectors are facing a challenger of their own: the interactive display for education.
In 2025, educators are faced with a real choice. Should you invest in modern interactive flat panels (IFPs) or upgrade to next-gen short-throw projectors? Both offer digital interactivity. Both can elevate instruction. But one clearly leads in long-term value, performance, and sustainability.
This post breaks down the key differences—brightness, color accuracy, maintenance, and more—so you can make a future-ready decision based on real classroom needs.
| Feature | Interactive Display for Education | Short-Throw Projector |
| Brightness | High brightness (350–500 nits); unaffected by ambient light | Dims in bright rooms; requires light control |
| Color Accuracy | Excellent clarity and color fidelity; great for media-rich content | Washed-out colors over time; image degradation with bulb wear |
| Interactivity | Built-in multi-touch; stylus + finger input; fast response | Requires calibration; limited to pen input in many models |
| Installation | Wall-mounted, plug-and-play; minimal setup | Ceiling or wall mount + screen calibration; more complex |
| Maintenance | Low—no bulbs or filters; 50,000+ hours LED lifespan | High—bulb replacements, filter cleaning, occasional recalibration |
| Software Integration | Native apps, screen mirroring, whiteboarding, cloud sync | Often requires external software or PC connection |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Higher upfront, lower long-term cost due to minimal maintenance | Lower upfront, but higher TCO over time due to consumables |
| Longevity | Built to last 7–10 years with minimal performance loss | 3–5 years before quality noticeably degrades |
Classrooms are bright—and they should be. Natural light supports alertness, mood, and energy. But projectors don’t always keep up.
Interactive displays deliver consistent, high-contrast images regardless of ambient lighting, making them ideal for daylight-filled classrooms, open-plan learning spaces, and even outdoor learning walls.
Projectors, even modern short-throw models, still suffer from image washout unless blinds are drawn or lights are dimmed. And when you factor in brightness degradation over time, displays win on consistency.
Verdict: Interactive displays are the clear leader in visibility and clarity.
When teaching with videos, simulations, or visual-heavy content like art or science diagrams, color accuracy matters. Interactive displays retain their full color profile for years, while projectors often suffer fading or discoloration after months of use—especially if bulbs aren’t replaced regularly.
In subjects like STEM, media arts, or even geography, the detail offered by high-resolution displays supports comprehension in ways traditional projection simply can’t.
Verdict: Interactive flat panels deliver sharper, more vibrant learning experiences.
While projectors have a lower upfront cost, they come with hidden expenses:
Interactive displays require almost no ongoing maintenance. With 50,000+ hours of LED life, zero bulb replacements, and cloud-managed software updates, they’re built for set-it-and-forget-it performance.
Verdict: Interactive displays win the long game on both maintenance and TCO.
Projectors with interactivity require sensors or pens—and often lag or calibration issues interrupt teaching. In contrast, interactive displays offer true multi-touch, stylus and finger input, and instant writing with no warm-up time.
Combined with built-in screen recording, whiteboarding, wireless casting, and app integration, displays help instructors focus on teaching, not tech troubleshooting.
Verdict: Interactive flat panels provide a smoother, more intuitive teaching experience.
With budgets tighter than ever, schools need tech that lasts. Projectors typically begin to degrade after three years, while IFPs are built for a 7–10 year lifecycle.
Plus, as classroom layouts evolve—moving toward flexible seating, learning zones, and hybrid models—wall-mounted displays adapt more easily. No need to account for projection angles or student shadow zones.
Verdict: Interactive displays are the better future-proof investment.
While short-throw projectors still have a place in ultra-low-budget or legacy environments, the classroom of 2025 is better served by the interactive display for education—especially as prices drop and feature sets grow.
From improved brightness and color accuracy to lower maintenance and stronger interactivity, interactive flat panels aren’t just replacing projectors—they’re redefining classroom engagement.
Whether you’re building new learning spaces or refreshing existing AV, now’s the time to lead with display-first design.
